Blog Archives


*Another one of rambling posts where I connect two thoughts, bear with me.

As I looked out the window this morning I saw a rabbit nibbling at the grass. I stood and watched it eat its breakfast while I ate mine and I quickly thought, ‘why do rabbits exist if all they eat is grass?’. Of course I knew the answer immediately, to act as a food source to some other larger predator. That’s the way life on earth works, complicated yet simple systems that have a specific purpose.

If you need the food chain explained to you, click here. But of course it’s more than the food chain, it’s our bodies themselves. Each system in the body(nervous, respiratory, etc), performs a certain function and that function helps the other systems. So your digestive system provides nutrients which give you energy with keeps your circulatory system functioning, which keeps your nervous system functioning and on and on the closed loop system goes.

Still there’s even more particulars to our bodies, the way our organs are positioned is even particular. Male and female reproductive organs are in the same place with makes things much more convenient than if the mans penis was on his ear and the womans vagina was on the back of her knee.

Whether you believe in a creator, evolution out of primordial soup or something in between the way each creature is “designed” and each system(i.e. the food chain, body functions) work is very specific. It would have been easier to “create” humans and animals that didn’t require such high maintenance. If we didn’t need to eat, or breath oxygen, or worry about bleeding out we could do so much more. Alas we are not toy dolls we are living creatures and thus have those needs.

What’s my point? There are systems at place in the world, large and small, complex and simple. From principles of diet and exercise to the food chain and beyond. They are what they are and they work they way they do for a reason. Now, in this society we seem to have an increasing number of people who whether through, naivete, ignorance, stupidity, or all of the above think we can simply do without the systems that have governed human civilization since its beginnings. I’m not talking about the digestive system now, but rather things like principles of economy and trade.

The solution to every social problem for these people is to make whatever is the issue free. Healthcare, free. K-University education, free. Food and shelter, free. Phones, free. Of course a society would do well to ensure its citizens have much, there is something wrong when people begin to believe it can simply be given away for free.

What they fail to recognize is that someone has to pay for that “free” education, and “free” obamaphone, and “free” healthcare. Now however a society wants to run its establishments is up to that society, but there is one fact that remains regardless. That is that there is no free lunch. Someone will be paying for it somehow.  The system of economics works very much like the food chain. Each person contributes a piece and each person receives a piece of a size commensurate to their “value” as determined by the system.

No amount of social engineering, or making everything “free” will change it, because it’s unavoidable, it’s simply the system by which things naturally work.


Free Second Child With Unwed Birth of Each Firstborn!

Once again it’s time to talk about single moms. I’ve laid out my thoughts here twice before with The Single Mom Outbreak, and Single Moms are Like Gloves.

This time single moms are in the news for a study that says 48 percent of first born children are born to unwed parents. That those parents may become wed after the childbirth doesn’t necessarily mean that out of all childbirth, 48 percent are born to single moms, hence the “firstborn” stipulation.

Still that is more bad news for society, because it is inevitable that single moms will eventually be in the majority. A society without families is not a society at all. Without a basis of life there is nothing else. You can read this in the text of many great philosophers, but it is not that thought that makes them great. Rather when someone like Jean Jacques Rousseau points out that the family is the first basis of society, he is making an obvious point which he then uses as a foundation for his more developed ideas. This applies to nearly all philosophers.

Back to the point, family is society. But in a society where people are less inclined and even encouraged to not form families, they may likely stop having kids. When kids are a boost to welfare resources they appeal to narcissism. As narcissism then permeates as the normal mindset, it is possible that the narcissists decide not to even have kids because they aren’t worth the time. Eventually, with luck, they essentially not breed themselves out of existence. We can only hope for as much.

Still the larger problem is what happens before then. There will be two futures both created by liberal ideology. One path will be the typical liberal brats who whine and complain about everything. They want this, they deserve that, life is hard, blah blah blah. These are also referred to as manginas, though many names are used for them, that is what we’ll use for todays references.

The other path will be the bandits. They’ll whine and complain to receive their free stuff too, but they won’t mope around with their efforts. They will extort their benefits through threat of violence compared to the annoyance tactics of the manginas. These are the urban youths of today who join gangs and generally do whatever they want. AKA thugs.

The determining factor in what path is taken is largely determined by race and can be witnessed today. However, in this future because there will be very few people with any technical knowledge or ability and the current segregated model will be unsustainable. Both groups will be forced closer together by necessity. This is where the one chance of hope for action exists. In the threatening proximity of the thugs, the defenseless manginas will be forced to either grow a pair of testicles or suffer regular nike swooshes to the face and torso.

Still neither group will build or maintain a nation. The thugs may continue to produce an underclass, but the manginas will more likely go extinct. It’s a tossup to ask if American society will go under from full on Sodom and Gomorrah hedonism or simply wither away from lack of care.

Year by year American civilization is eroded just a bit further. Perhaps in the future they will exist on reservations as Indians once did and still do to an extent, and perhaps even Canada will be a safe haven for all the Americans who practice 6,000 years of proven human history. However since Canada itself is following many of the choices that led to Americas destruction that is unknown. Still Canadians tend to be more pragmatic and can hopefully make the necessary corrections that we cannot seem to make.

Suicide as Male Privilege

On Manosphere blogs one of the things that is pointed out in order to refute claims of “male privilege” is the suicide rate of men versus women.

Here’s the data on that;

suicide stats
















Of course there are many factors that have a part to play in suicides and without being able to ask the victims why they did it it’s hard to know for sure. Therefore it is next to impossible to know the cause on a case by case basis. However because the statistics lean so heavily towards males that probably tells us a lot anyway. Enough to understand the root cause.

Perhaps it’s simply that women are better at handling the issues that cause suicides, or that they simply don’t have the gumption to do that much harm to themselves. Though more than likely it is that men have more to live for and thus a failure of life for them is more inexcusable.

Men want to work, to provide. To be able to succeed in something in order to raise their family and pass on their name. There are thousands of years of civilization that prove this. We can debate the finer points of that issue, as to whether regular Joe could’ve gone his own way a thousand years ago or not, but the fact is he(all men) didn’t.

Men have a higher standard of what is an acceptable life’s performance than women. The average man, despite feminists best efforts, still wants to work and support his family. Failure to accomplish that, to provide for his family, leaves little else for him to do. If he fails at the biggest purpose he has been given it is of little consolation that he is a good farmer, carpenter, or IT tech.

Women on the other hand, haven’t got as much to live for. Oddly enough, womens traditional role was to care for the family that the male supported. It is because of that, they are less likely to feel like a failure. If the husband fails to provide for the family, it has little to do with her ability/role to care for the family. It may make it more difficult, but it doesn’t diminish her role in any way. She can not be a failure because of his failure.

If the husband/provider is a failure he has failed grandly. It is much harder(almost impossible) for a wife/caretaker to fail because the responsibility is on a secondary level to the providers.

This combined with men and women’s different capabilities in mental processing is what contributes to the high male suicide rate. When men fail they are more likely to simply take themselves out. In their mind, what else can they do, what use  are they?

Therefore it is safe to assume that in a modern, feminist society that demeans men and belittles their work and often casts them adrift without any concern for mental well-being and desire to work and provide is likely to create an increasing rate of suicides. However, I would be willing to bet that among the Red Pill & MGTOW crowds, that their awareness of the issues and often willful removal from the system or at least its mentalities, have a far lower suicide rate than the average male of the system.